When it comes to your business needs, do you know which cloud computing platform would be a better fit: the all-encompassing AWS or the developer-oriented Heroku? With 51% of their client base residing in America, AWS remains a popular choice among many. Meanwhile, 48% of companies run their services on Heroku's platform.
Key Takeaways
- AWS offers comprehensive cloud services such as IaaS (infrastructure as a Service), SaaS(Software as a Service), and PaaS(Platform as a Service). In contrast, Heroku operates solely as a PaaS (Platform as a Service), focusing on the app deployment process and management.
- AWS has a market share of 50.1%, but Heroku only has 1.8% in the global cloud computing market.
- AWS cloud services are most suitable for medium and large businesses, while Heroku is popular among startups and enterprise projects.
- Heroku is more expensive than AWS services; Its cost can reach $17,000 per month for just some applications and databases.
AWS vs Heroku: A Basic Overview
AWS and Heroku are popular cloud computing services. However, they differ in key areas. Understanding their differences helps choose the right cloud hosting platform.
What is Heroku?
Heroku is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) based on the cloud. It runs on top of AWS, and it was created to make it easy to deploy, manage, and scale applications. Heroku platform uses dynos, which are lightweight Linux containers where applications run. The platform automatically configures infrastructure management and has various version control, testing, and collaboration tools, among other services. For startups who want fast deployments or any business that needs simplicity while deploying its app, Heroku will be the best choice for them.
Advantages of Heroku
- Easy Usage: Heroku makes deployment and management simple for startups and small teams. It automatically sets up the infrastructure and provides resources; thus no need for a dedicated DevOps team.
- Developer Friendly: Heroku Cloud services has a smooth developer experience with version control tools, an easy deployment process as well as quick scaling capabilities. Additionally, developers can use any programming language and add-ons to improve functionality.
- Swift Deployment: Heroku's pre-configured environment facilitates fast application deployment and scaling, which greatly reduces development time.
Disadvantages of Heroku
- Cost: The number and size of dynos used to determine the amount charged by Heroku. Therefore, larger sites with more traffic may incur high costs since they will be charged approximately $35 per dyno per month.
- Low Flexibility: Heroku platform cannot support very complicated apps, such as microservices, that need a lot of cloud resources.
What is AWS?
AWS (Amazon Web Services) is a comprehensive cloud computing platform by Amazon. The popular AWS services include launching multiple app instances with elastic compute cloud (EC2), computing, storage, networking, AWS lambda, databases, analytics, machine learning, and security. AWS supports multiple cloud computing models: IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), PaaS, and SaaS (Software as a Service). It has flexible pricing options like pay-as-you-go and subscriptions, catering to businesses of all sizes.
Advantages of AWS Services
- Flexibility and Power: The AWS IaaS platform provides flexible, robust infrastructure management. It excels at handling intricate solutions needing sophisticated orchestration and upkeep, compared to Heroku. AWS effectively supports complex applications like microservices.
- High-Load Applications: AWS is well-suited for running high-load apps requiring substantial computing power. It offers automated functions like server and environment configurations and scaling. This enables quick, scalable deployments tailored to project needs.
Disadvantages of AWS Cloud Services
- Complexity: AWS has a huge range of services, which makes it hard to find the right solution quickly.
- Management Overhead: Though AWS automates many tasks, developers still need to handle various management duties. This often requires a DevOps team, shifting focus from product to computing infrastructure.
AWS vs Heroku: The Key Differences
Let's understand the key differences between the AWS and Heroku Cloud in terms of features, pricing, scalability, and so on.
Heroku vs. AWS: Features
Features | Heroku | AWS |
Runtime Environment | Fully flexible with smart containers (dynos).
| Multiple deployment options and direct access to server resources.
|
Rollback | Easy rollback of database or code.
| Ability to roll back to previous versions.
|
App Monitoring
| Tracks metrics like response time, throughput, and memory.
| App metrics included.
|
Integration
| Full GitHub integration.
| AWS Service Integration.
|
Languages | Supports Ruby, Java, PHP, Python, Node.js, Go, Scala, and Docker (with some complexity). | Supports any language but requires advanced knowledge.
|
Addons and Services
| Hundreds of add-ons for security, mailing, content management, testing, alerts, and notifications. About 700 third-party components.
| Over 200 services and 2000 features including computing, storage, databases, analytics, networking, and more.
|
Regions | 2 main regions (Europe and USA) and 6 smaller regions (Virginia, Oregon, Dublin, Frankfurt, Sydney, Tokyo) for Private Spaces. | Available in 190 countries and territories worldwide.
|
VPC (Virtual Private Cloud)
| Supported with Heroku Enterprise plan and Shield option, with a one-year commitment. | Included at no extra cost.
|
Compliance | HIPAA and SOC2 compliance with Heroku Enterprise and Shield option.
| Includes HIPAA and SOC2 compliance with built-in features like database encryption, VPC security groups, and firewalls. |
Heroku vs. AWS: Pricing
Both platforms offer different pricing according to the services provided; let's check them out here:
Cloud Computing
Heroku offers Dyno plans starting from $250/month for Performance-m(2.5GB) and going up to $750/month for Standard 4(30 GB RAM, 750 GB storage). AWS provides EC2 On-Demand Linux Instances, such as t3.micro for $7.48/month, t3.small for $14.98/month, and c5.2xlarge for $244.80/month.
Database
Heroku's Heroku Postgres Standard 4 costs $750/month, while AWS's RDS for PostgreSQL db.t3.large is priced at $546/month.
In-Memory Storage
Heroku Redis Premium-9 is available for $1,450/month, whereas AWS's ElastiCache cache.r4.large costs $164.16/month.
Object Storage
Heroku does not directly offer object storage but recommends using Amazon S3, which is available as part of AWS offerings.
Data Streaming
Apache Kafka Basic-2 on Heroku is priced at $175/month, while Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) on AWS totals $50.58/month.
Support Plans
Heroku offers free Standard support and premium options starting from $1,000/month. AWS provides a Basic free tier and paid Developer, Business, and Enterprise plans based on AWS usage.
Service | Heroku | AWS (Amazon EC2) |
---|---|---|
Hosting Type | Platform as a Service (PaaS) | Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) |
Instance Type | Dyno (Shared or Dedicated) | EC2 Instance |
Pricing Model | Pay as you go | Pay as you go |
Base Pricing | Free tier available, Paid plans start at $7/mo | Free tier available, Paid plans start at $0.0059/hour |
Storage | Included in the the dyno price | EBS Volume pricing varies |
Compute Resources | Included in dyno price | EC2 Instance pricing varies |
Database | Add-on pricing varies | RDS pricing varies |
Data Transfer | Included up to certain limits, then priced per GB | Data Transfer pricing varies |
Support | Included in paid plans | Basic support included, premium support available |
Calculator for Heroku and AWS Pricing
AWS vs Heroku: Scaling Capabilities
Both platforms offer scalability options, but their approaches differ. Heroku enables manual horizontal and vertical scaling via its dashboard or CLI. It also provides auto-scaling for Private Space dynos. AWS supports AutoScale and has dedicated services for auto-scaling and reserving computing capacity based on demand.
Heroku caters to beginners, requiring less technical expertise for basic deployments and scaling operations. However, AWS, being a comprehensive cloud platform with numerous services, demands advanced technical knowledge to utilize and manage its scalability features and other services efficiently.
Heroku's pricing model is relatively inexpensive for starting projects. But it can become very costly as scaling requirements increase. AWS may have higher upfront costs for initial deployments. But its pricing structure and scalability options make it more cost-effective as workloads and resource demands grow, especially for larger projects and enterprises.
Heroku vs. AWS: Ease of Use
Heroku and AWS have different approaches for developers. Heroku focuses on simplicity with clear guides. Its deployment uses Git and takes under 30 minutes. However, it has less control over computing resources compared to Infrastructure-as-a-Service like AWS. Heroku is ideal for beginners.
AWS offers many management tools and services. It provides immense flexibility and granular resource control. But this requires advanced technical skills to navigate documentation, manage deployment, and optimize infrastructure. While Heroku simplifies DevOps, AWS empowers full control. AWS suits organizations with specialists proficient in infrastructure scaling.
Heroku vs. AWS: Monitoring & Logging
Monitoring and logging are crucial for managing cloud apps and infrastructure. Both providers offer solutions. Heroku provides Librato and Heroku Dashboard for monitoring apps and platform resources. AWS offers comprehensive monitoring with AWS Trusted Advisor and Amazon CloudWatch for AWS services and custom resources.
Heroku's logging options include Papertrail, Heroku Logging Add-ons, and Coralogix Logging for centralizing and analyzing app logs. AWS logging services like AWS CloudTrail and CloudWatch Logs track user activity and API usage and collect logs from AWS services and apps.
Although both offer monitoring and logging, AWS generally provides more comprehensive and scalable solutions. AWS tools deeply integrate with numerous services, simplifying monitoring and logging complex architectures and large deployments. However, Heroku's options align with its focus on simplicity and ease for app deployment and management.
Feature | Heroku | AWS |
---|---|---|
Scalability | Vertical and horizontal scaling available | Vertical and horizontal scaling available |
Horizontal Scaling | Automatic scaling based on web and worker dynos | Autoscaling groups for EC2 instances |
Vertical Scaling | Limited to dyno size adjustment | Vertical scaling by changing instance types |
Load Balancing | Included with platform | Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) or Application Load Balancer (ALB) |
Auto-Scaling | Automatic scaling based on predefined rules | Autoscaling based on CloudWatch metrics |
Database Scaling | Add-ons for managed databases | RDS for managed relational databases, DynamoDB for NoSQL |
Storage Scaling | Add-ons for various storage solutions | Scalable storage solutions like S3, EBS, and EFS |
Network Scaling | Network resources automatically scale | Network resources scale with instance types |
Global Scalability | Global presence with Heroku Private Spaces | Global infrastructure with multiple regions |
Customization | Limited customization options | Highly customizable infrastructure with AWS |
Comparing Scenarios where Heroku and AWS are more suitable
Scenario | Heroku | AWS |
---|---|---|
Small Startups | Heroku is ideal due to its ease of use, minimal setup, and managed services. | |
Prototyping and Development | Quick deployment and integrated tools make it suitable for prototyping. | |
Simple Web Applications | Perfect for simple apps with low to medium traffic. | |
Educational Projects | Provides a straightforward platform for learning and teaching. | |
Large Enterprises | AWS offers services and scalability for large enterprises. | |
Complex Applications | Suitable for complex apps and required advanced configurations. | |
High Scalability Needs | Provides high scalability and performance for growing needs. | |
Custom Infrastructure Requirements | Allows for custom infrastructure |
Useful AWS and Heroku Commands:
Functionality | Heroku Command | AWS Command |
---|---|---|
Login to CLI |
|
|
Create a new app |
|
|
Deploy an app |
|
|
View app logs |
|
|
Scale dynos/instances |
|
|
Open the app in a browser |
| N/A (Open the app URL in your browser manually) |
Set environment variables |
|
|
View environment variables |
|
|
Run a one-off command |
|
|
List all apps/environments |
|
|
Delete an app/environment |
|
|
Attach a database |
|
|
Migrate database |
| N/A (Run database migration commands specific to your application and database) |
View current releases |
|
|
Rollback to a previous release |
| N/A (AWS Elastic Beanstalk does not have a direct rollback command, but you can create a new environment with a previous version) |
Add a custom domain |
|
|
SSL Certificate Management |
|
|
List environment variables |
|
|
Heroku vs. AWS: Quick Comparison
Before going to the final verdict, let's have a quick comparison table that will help you learn about both platforms in one glance:
Basis | AWS | Heroku |
Owner | Amazon | Salesforce |
Type of Business | Startup, Mid-scale | Mid-scale, Large enterprises |
Ease of use | Require technical team | Beginner-friendly |
Deployment Speed | Faster | Fast |
Supported Architecture | Database and Application Tier, Load balancer Platform. | Load Balancer/Web server, Database tier. |
Companies using | Ericsson, Toyota, Ellie Mae, Choice Hotels, Yesware, Syniverse, Westfield. | Airbnb, Atlassian, Agile Ventures, Full Stack Academy. |
Final Verdict
Both Heroku and AWS are powerful platforms. Each excels in different areas. There's no simple answer to which one is best when comparing Heroku vs. AWS. But considering the differences mentioned above can guide your decision.
Ultimately, understand your organization's required features and know how much you can invest in them. Also, assess your team's DevOps skills and resources before choosing. Pick the platform that helps achieve business goals while keeping developers productive.
Which is right for you?
In short, use Heroku if:
- You prioritize speed over cost (ideal for building MVP apps, deploying, and testing quickly).
- Your team lacks dedicated DevOps engineers.
- Your project is relatively simple, requiring modest computing power.
- You prefer using Git for deployment.
Use AWS if:
- You need flexible infrastructure and granular server/environment control.
- Your team has experienced DevOps engineers.
- You require auto-scaling and support for complex projects, including microservices
- You want to avoid vendor lock-in and want greater flexibility. A Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution like Heroku won't give you that.
Your choice between Heroku and AWS cloud hosting should depend on your needs, tech skills, and long-term goals. Heroku is great for quick app deployment and testing, and it's developer-friendly. AWS offers unmatched flexibility, scalability, and infrastructure control. But AWS has a steep learning curve and has high operational complexity.
Read More
https://devopsden.io/article/aws-devops-interview-questions
Follow us on
Table of Contents